Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Balancing service provision and surgical training is a challenging issue that affects all healthcare systems. A multicentre prospective study of 1501 total hip replacements was undertaken to investigate whether there is an association between surgical outcome and the grade of the operating surgeon, and whether there is any difference in outcome if surgeons' assistants assist with the operation, rather than orthopaedic trainees. The primary outcome measure was the change in the Oxford hip score (OHS) at five years. Secondary outcomes included the rate of revision and dislocation, operating time, and length of hospital stay. There was no significant difference in DeltaOHS or complication rates between operations undertaken by trainers and trainees, or those at which surgeons' assistants and trainees were the assistant. However, there was a significant difference in the duration of surgery, with a mean reduction of 28 minutes in those in which a surgeons' assistant was the assistant. This study provides evidence that total hip replacements can be performed safely and effectively by appropriately trained surgeons in training, and that there are potential benefits of using surgeons' assistants in orthopaedic surgery.

Original publication

DOI

10.1302/0301-620X.91B7.22021

Type

Journal article

Journal

J Bone Joint Surg Br

Publication Date

07/2009

Volume

91

Pages

928 - 934

Keywords

Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Clinical Audit, Clinical Competence, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Orthopedics, Prospective Studies, Quality of Health Care, Surgery Department, Hospital, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult